A popular thread on r/Watches asked a provocative question: which watch brand today occupies the place Rolex did half a century ago? Posted by u/redalexei on Sep 20, 2023, the discussion drew strong engagement—198 upvotes and 294 comments—inviting collectors and casual observers to weigh in.
One comment captured the tone of the conversation: “Quartz watches basically annihilated the premium tool watch market and it was reborn as a sort of luxury larping space.” That observation—quoted directly from the thread—frames the debate as more than brand comparison. It suggests a shift in the watch industry’s identity: from practical toolmaking toward a modern luxury culture built as much on perception and storytelling as on original function.
The Reddit post didn’t land on a single answer. Instead, it opened up a wider conversation about how watchmaking, market forces and shifting tastes changed the playing field, and whether any contemporary maker truly mirrors Rolex’s mid‑20th century role. With nearly 300 comments, the thread became a hub for memory, opinion and heated takeaways—proof that for many the question of what “Rolex used to mean” remains as interesting as the watches themselves.
Whether you’re searching for historical context or just enjoy the argument, the r/Watches thread highlights how a simple question about brands can surface larger debates about value, function and identity in horology.
Leave a Reply